🔗 Share this article

Australia's decisive move to ban social platforms access for individuals under sixteen is creating waves internationally. Politicians, campaigners, and families are observing intently to see if this approach will inspire imitation for other nations.

The European Momentum

Throughout Europe, a increasing group of nations are moving toward comparable restrictions.

• The Danish government plans a ban on social media for youth below 15, with the leader arguing that mobile devices and platforms are "stealing our youngsters' childhood". The policy is expected to be passed next year.
• The Norwegian government is preparing to implement a minimum age limit of 15, pointing to the need to protect young people from the "power of the AI".
• Ireland is working on a online verification tool to confirm the user details of social media participants. The media minister have suggested that an Australia-style ban could be "a potential tools on the table".
• In Spain, the leader has urged the legislature to enact a bill lifting the minimum age for joining social media to 16.
• In The French government, the head of state has proposed a ban for children below 15, and a legislative committee has recommended a related step, alongside an overnight "digital curfew" for adolescents.
• The administration in The Netherlands has advised families to block their children from social media until 15.

Across the European Union, the bloc's legislature has approved a symbolic resolution demanding a ban for under-16s unless parental consent is provided. Although it warns of the "habit-forming" quality of these services, the step does not create binding law.

"A clear age limit is a solid first step," commented a leading parliamentarian driving the initiative.

The UK: A Cautious Approach

For the United Kingdom, the government has not ruled out a potential ban, stating that "nothing is discarded" but stressing any policy must be "supported by conclusive evidence".

Previously, support grew behind a bill to introduce controls on social media use by under-16s, but it was ultimately modified. Nonetheless, the government pledged to conduct more studies the matter.

Charities have voiced warnings. An organization set up by the family of a teenager who took her own life after being exposed to harmful online content argues that a blanket age ban might not make platforms safer and could lead to a "dangerous transition" of risk when users turn 16.

"The Australian ban is a response to the failure of the tech sector to build platforms and apps that are appropriate and suitable for children," said a leading child protection advocate.

The United States: A Decentralized Approach

Across America, legislation is largely happening at the local level due to national inaction.

• The state of Utah requires adult approval for under-18s to use social media and restricts late-night use.
• The state of Florida has enacted a law barring under-14s from creating accounts on social media, though it is entangled in legal challenges.
• The state of Virginia has approved a rule limiting teenagers to one hour of social media use per day, with extra time needing adult consent.
• Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have also passed bills requiring parental consent for teenagers to create social media accounts.

Even with widespread concern and calls from various politicians to copy this path, a federal ban is presently seen as a distant prospect.

Global Perspectives

Outside of the West, additional states are similarly taking action.

• Malaysia aims to restrict social media for those under sixteen effective next year.
• Brazil has lifted the minimum age for the platform Instagram to 16.

But, world agencies take a more nuanced position. The UN children's agency has warned that age-based restrictions pose dangers and "could backfire". The body highlights that online platforms can be a "lifeline" for vulnerable youth and that government action should not be a "excuse" for platform operators to prioritize user protection.

While this worldwide conversation evolves, the actions of Australia and its followers demonstrate that states around the world are less and less willing to delay for tech companies to self-regulate.